Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome

T Almeida Santos, S El Shourbagy, Justin St John

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    249 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To determine the content of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in oocytes from a range of patients with fertilization success and failure. Design: Analysis of mtDNA content in fertilized and unfertilized oocytes and embryos by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Setting: University hospital infertility and research center. Patient(s): Fifty-four women seeking treatment for infertility. Intervention(S): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): A total of 142 fertilized and unfertilized oocytes were classified into three main groups. Group I consisted of 35 fertilized oocytes from 21 patients; group 11, 65 unfertilized oocytes from 36 patients; and group 111, 42 degenerate oocytes from 23 patients. Mitochondrial DNA content was determined by SYBR Green real-time PCR-based assay. Result(s): The mean mtDNA copy number for the fertilized oocytes was 250,454, whereas for the unfertilized group it was 163,698. There were significant differences for mtDNA copy number between the male factor and female factor infertility unfertilized oocytes and between the unexplained infertility and female factor infertility groups. The mean copy number for the degenerate oocyte group was 44,629, which was significantly different from the other subdivisions in this group. Conclusion(s): Mitochondrial DNA content is critical to fertilization outcome and serves as an important marker of oocyte quality, explaining some cases of fertilization failure.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)584-591
    Number of pages8
    JournalFertility and Sterility
    Volume85
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2006

    Keywords

    • mitochondria
    • fertilization
    • oocyte
    • embryo
    • mitochondrial DNA
    • human

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this