Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete: a RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity

  • Viktor Mechtcherine
  • , Shravan Muthukrishnan
  • , Annika Robens-Radermacher
  • , Rob Wolfs
  • , Jelle Versteege
  • , Costantino Menna
  • , Onur Ozturk
  • , Nilufer Ozyurt
  • , Josef Roupec
  • , Christiane Richter
  • , Jörg Jungwirth
  • , Luiza Miranda
  • , Rebecca Ammann
  • , Jean François Caron
  • , Victor de Bono
  • , Renate Monte
  • , Iván Navarrete
  • , Claudia Eugenin
  • , Hélène Lombois-Burger
  • , Bilal Baz
  • Maris Sinka, Alise Sapata, Ilhame Harbouz, Yamei Zhang, Zijian Jia, Jacques Kruger, Jean Pierre Mostert, Mateja Štefančič, Lucija Hanžič, Abdelhak Kaci, Said Rahal, Manu Santhanam, Shantanu Bhattacherjee, Chalermwut Snguanyat, Arun Arunothayan, Zengfeng Zhao, Inka Mai, Inken Jette Rasehorn, David Böhler, Niklas Freund, Dirk Lowke, Tobias Neef, Markus Taubert, Daniel Auer, C. Maximilian Hechtl, Maximilian Dahlenburg, Laura Esposito, Richard Buswell, John Kolawole, Muhammad Nura Isa, Xingzi Liu, Zhendi Wang, Kolluru Subramaniam, Freek Bos*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditional construction techniques, such as in-situ casting and pre-cast concrete methods, have well-established testing protocols for assessing compressive strength and modulus of elasticity, including specific procedures for sample preparation and curing. In contrast, 3D concrete printing currently lacks standardized testing protocols, potentially contributing to the inconsistent results reported in previous studies. To address this issue, RILEM TC 304-ADC initiated a comprehensive interlaboratory study on the mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete. This study involves 30 laboratories worldwide, contributing 34 sets of data, with some laboratories testing more than one mix design. The compressive strength and modulus of elasticity were determined under three distinct conditions: Default, where each laboratory printed according to their standard procedure followed by water bath curing; Deviation 1, which involved creating a cold joint by increasing the time interval between printing layers; and Deviation 2, where the standard printing process was used, but the specimens were cured under conditions different from water bath. Some tests were conducted at two different scales based on specimen size—“mortar-scale” and “concrete-scale”—to investigate the size effect on compressive strength. Since the mix design remained identical for both scales, the only variable was the specimen size. This paper reports on the findings from the interlaboratory study, followed by a detailed investigation into the influencing parameters such as extraction location, cold joints, number of interlayers, and curing conditions on the mechanical properties of the printed concrete. As this study includes results from laboratories worldwide, its contribution to the development of relevant standardized testing protocols is critical.

Original languageEnglish
Article number181
Number of pages30
JournalMaterials and Structures
Volume58
Issue number5
Early online date24 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Additive manufacturing
  • Compressive strength
  • Digital fabrication
  • Hardened concrete
  • Young’s modulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • General Materials Science
  • Mechanics of Materials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete: a RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this