Measuring 'Virtue' in Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
357 Downloads (Pure)


Virtue-approaches to medical ethics are becoming ever more influential. Virtue theorists advocate redefining right or good action in medicine in terms of the character of the doctor performing the action (rather than adherence to rules or principles). In medical education, too, calls are growing to reconceive medical education as a form of character formation (rather than instruction in rules or principles). Empirical studies of doctors' ethics from a virtue-perspective, however, are few and far between. In this respect, theoretical and empirical study of medical ethics are out of alignment. In this paper, we survey the empirical study of medical ethics and find that most studies of doctors' ethics are rules- or principles-based and not virtue-based. We outline the challenges that exist for studying medical ethics empirically from a virtue-based perspective and canvas the runners and riders in the effort to find virtue-based assessments of medical ethics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149–161
JournalMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Issue number2
Early online date2 Jul 2015
Publication statusPublished - 2015


  • medical ethics
  • virtue
  • deontology
  • Kohlberg
  • professionalism
  • wisdom
  • empathy
  • caring


Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring 'Virtue' in Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this