Measurement tools for mental health problems and mental well-being in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic review

  • Samantha Flynn*
  • , Leen Vereenooghe
  • , Richard P Hastings
  • , Dawn Adams
  • , Sally-Ann Cooper
  • , Nick Gore
  • , Chris Hatton
  • , Kerry Hood
  • , Andrew Jahoda
  • , Peter Langdon
  • , Rachel McNamara
  • , Chris Oliver
  • , Ashok Roy
  • , Vasiliki Totsika
  • , Jane Waite
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
278 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mental health problems affect people with intellectual disabilities (ID) at rates similar to or in excess of the non-ID population. People with severe ID are likely to have persistent mental health problems. In this systematic review (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015024469), we identify and evaluate the methodological quality of available measures of mental health problems or well-being in individuals with severe or profound ID. Electronic searches of ten databases identified relevant publications. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved records (n=41,232) and full-text articles (n=573). Data were extracted and the quality of included papers was appraised. Thirty-two papers reporting on 12 measures were included. Nine measures addressed a broad spectrum of mental health problems, and were largely observational. One physiological measure of well-being was included. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped Scale-II and Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire are reliable measures in this population. However, the psychometric properties of six other measures were only considered within a single study - indicating a lack of research replication. Few mental health measures are available for people with severe or profound ID, particularly lacking are tools measuring well-being. Assessment methods that do not rely on proxy reports should be explored further.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-44
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume57
Early online date11 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Intellectual disabilities
  • Mental health
  • Mental illness
  • Psychiatric disorder
  • Mental well-being
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement tools for mental health problems and mental well-being in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this