Maximisation in extra-welfarism: A critique of the current position in health economics

Joanna Coast

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper explores critically the use of 'maximisation' as a decision rule within extra-welfarism. Although extra-welfarism in theory focuses on a broader evaluative space than that of utility, in practice there is a narrowing to a focus on health alone; this clear disjoint is one of the factors that makes discussion of extra-welfarism difficult. In this paper we focus on the reality of extra-welfarism as currently practiced (that is, as health maximisation). The paper questions whether a change (from welfarism to extra-welfarism) of the evaluative space from utility to health, automatically implies a change in the rule for decision making from utility maximisation to health maximisation. Both theoretical and empirical grounds are considered. It is reasoned here that the separation of efficiency and equity associated with welfarism is no longer possible within a health evaluative space. Thus any maximisation of health is instead aligned with Bentham's felicific calculus, and implies the acceptance of an ethical basis of utilitarianism. Empirical grounds for maximisation, based on the views of members of society, do not seem to support such a utilitarian ethical basis for the production and distribution of health. This leaves health economists very much relying on perceptions of decision makers' values in their support of health maximisation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)786-792
    Number of pages7
    JournalSocial Science & Medicine
    Volume69
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2009

    Keywords

    • Non-welfarism
    • Capability
    • Welfarism
    • Economics
    • Maximisation
    • Extra-welfarism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Maximisation in extra-welfarism: A critique of the current position in health economics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this