Market share in a post-entry game

C. B. Lee, L. R. Fletcher, J. M. Binner*, W. D. Murphy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the dynamics of market share within a contemporary, real life, entry deterrence situation in the provision of National Health Service (NHS) pathology services. The major conclusion is that the previous Government’s initiatives did not succeed in promoting competition in markets where existing NHS providers were operating significantly more efficiently than their neighbours. Evidence suggests managers were influenced more by potential competition from a new private sector entrant than by actual competition among existing providers. The effect of a new entrant is modelled as a perturbation of a pre-existing stable equilibrium in a seeming oligopoly influenced by market forces subject to Government regulation. Economic analysis of the market share which a new entry might gain shows that, on the assumptions made and contrary to expectations, the likely impact of Government regulation of NHS prices would be an increase in price per test in most of the market. Nevertheless the policy objective of improving quality at value for money prices was achieved for the near-monopoly provider within our case study area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-510
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2001

Keywords

  • Game theory
  • Market share
  • Strategic entry deterrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Market share in a post-entry game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this