Abstract
We study the implications of ambiguity under arbitrage constraints and in a market dominated by retail investors to understand its impact on asset pricing. We propose a novel approach to empirically measure stock level ambiguity and analyse how ambiguity-averse investors respond to varying levels of market ambiguity. In contrast to the previous research, we find a positive ambiguity premium. We attribute this to investors’ underreaction caused by the presence of significant market frictions in China. The results are robust across different factor models, alternative measure of market ambiguity, and varied portfolio formation approaches. Our findings suggest that ambiguity could be an important missing factor that could explain the much-debated high equity risk premium puzzle.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting |
| Early online date | 28 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 28 Mar 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Asset pricing
- Equity risk premium
- Ambiguity
- Market frictions
- Uncertainty
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Market Frictions, Ambiguity and Asset Pricing: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver