Knowing their place on the roads : what would equality mean for walking and cycling?

Caroline Mullen, Miles Tight, Anthony Whiteing, Ann Jopson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
1531 Downloads (Pure)


Trials and dangers faced by pedestrians and cyclists have not only created an impression of undesirable conditions, but have promoted arguments of injustice and inequality. High rates of death and injury coupled with reporting of poor infrastructure and fear of the behaviour of other road users point to a plausible prima facie concern that pedestrians and cyclists suffer inequalities. Yet this appearance masks uncertainty about what factors are relevant in judging inequality and how these should be treated against potentially competing claims. This article develops a framework assessing conditions for walking and cycling according to a theoretical conception of political and social equality, and so providing a basis on which to make arguments for change in transport policy, planning and law. In developing the framework we examine the relevance to equality of a range of factors, including measurement of road casualties, questions of responsibility to increase walking and cycling as means of contributing to pollution and carbon reduction, matters of fault and responsibility for road safety, and the economic impacts of improving conditions for walking and cycling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-248
JournalTransportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice: an international journal
Early online date4 Mar 2014
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014


  • Philosophy
  • Equality
  • Walking
  • Cycling
  • Risk
  • Access


Dive into the research topics of 'Knowing their place on the roads : what would equality mean for walking and cycling?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this