Killing norms softly: US targeted killing, quasi-secrecy and the assassination ban

Adam Quinn, Andris Banka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
213 Downloads (Pure)


This article argues that when actors engage in controversial new security practices, it is misconceived to view secrecy as an opposed, counterproductive alternative to the pursuit of legitimation. Rather, we propose, deployment of “quasi-secrecy”—a combination of official secrecy with leaks, selective disclosure, and de facto public awareness—can be an effective strategy for achieving normalization and legitimation while containing the risks entailed by disclosure. We support this claim via a detailed case study of US targeted killing. First, we establish the existence of an American norm against targeted killing during the period 1976–2001. We then detail the process by which an innovation in practice was secretly approved, implemented, became known, and was gradually, partially officially acknowledged. We argue that even if quasi-secrecy was not in this instance a coherently-conceived and deliberately pursued strategy from start to finish, the case provides proof of concept for its potential to be deployed as such.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-703
Number of pages39
JournalSecurity Studies
Issue number4
Early online date19 Jul 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jul 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Killing norms softly: US targeted killing, quasi-secrecy and the assassination ban'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this