Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

Claus Svendsen; Lee A Walker; Marianne Matzke; Elma Lahive; Samuel Harrison; Alison Crossley; Barry Park; Stephen Lofts; Iseult Lynch; Socorro Vázquez-Campos; Ralf Kaegi; Alexander Gogos; Christof Asbach; Geert Cornelis; Frank von der Kammer; Nico W van den Brink; Claire Mays; David J Spurgeon

doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

Claus Svendsen, Lee A Walker, Marianne Matzke, Elma Lahive, Samuel Harrison, Alison Crossley, Barry Park, Stephen Lofts, Iseult Lynch, Socorro Vázquez-Campos, Ralf Kaegi, Alexander Gogos, Christof Asbach, Geert Cornelis, Frank von der Kammer, Nico W van den Brink, Claire Mays, David J Spurgeon

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nanotechnology is identified as a key enabling technology due to its potential to contribute to economic growth and societal well-being across industrial sectors. Sustainable nanotechnology requires a scientifically based and proportionate risk governance structure to support innovation, including a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods established for conventional chemicals to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Exposure assessment developed as a tiered approach is equally beneficial to nano-specific ERA as for other classes of chemicals. Here we present the developing knowledge, practical considerations and key principles need to support exposure assessment for engineered nanomaterials for regulatory and research applications.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	731-742
Journal	Nature Nanotechnology
Volume	15
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 17 Aug 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

Cite this

Svendsen, C., Walker, L. A., Matzke, M., Lahive, E., Harrison, S., Crossley, A., Park, B., Lofts, S., Lynch, I., Vázquez-Campos, S., Kaegi, R., Gogos, A., Asbach, C., Cornelis, G., von der Kammer, F., van den Brink, N. W., Mays, C., & Spurgeon, D. J. (2020). Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment. Nature Nanotechnology, 15(9), 731-742. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

@article{096ca989242845b48d6781a6f6140b46,

title = "Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment",

abstract = "Nanotechnology is identified as a key enabling technology due to its potential to contribute to economic growth and societal well-being across industrial sectors. Sustainable nanotechnology requires a scientifically based and proportionate risk governance structure to support innovation, including a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods established for conventional chemicals to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Exposure assessment developed as a tiered approach is equally beneficial to nano-specific ERA as for other classes of chemicals. Here we present the developing knowledge, practical considerations and key principles need to support exposure assessment for engineered nanomaterials for regulatory and research applications.",

author = "Claus Svendsen and Walker, {Lee A} and Marianne Matzke and Elma Lahive and Samuel Harrison and Alison Crossley and Barry Park and Stephen Lofts and Iseult Lynch and Socorro V{\'a}zquez-Campos and Ralf Kaegi and Alexander Gogos and Christof Asbach and Geert Cornelis and {von der Kammer}, Frank and {van den Brink}, {Nico W} and Claire Mays and Spurgeon, {David J}",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "17",

doi = "10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "731--742",

journal = "Nature Nanotechnology",

issn = "1748-3387",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "9",

}

Svendsen, C, Walker, LA, Matzke, M, Lahive, E, Harrison, S, Crossley, A, Park, B, Lofts, S, Lynch, I, Vázquez-Campos, S, Kaegi, R, Gogos, A, Asbach, C, Cornelis, G, von der Kammer, F, van den Brink, NW, Mays, C & Spurgeon, DJ 2020, 'Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment', Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 731-742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

AU - Svendsen, Claus

AU - Walker, Lee A

AU - Matzke, Marianne

AU - Lahive, Elma

AU - Harrison, Samuel

AU - Crossley, Alison

AU - Park, Barry

AU - Lofts, Stephen

AU - Lynch, Iseult

AU - Vázquez-Campos, Socorro

AU - Kaegi, Ralf

AU - Gogos, Alexander

AU - Asbach, Christof

AU - Cornelis, Geert

AU - von der Kammer, Frank

AU - van den Brink, Nico W

AU - Mays, Claire

AU - Spurgeon, David J

PY - 2020/8/17

Y1 - 2020/8/17

N2 - Nanotechnology is identified as a key enabling technology due to its potential to contribute to economic growth and societal well-being across industrial sectors. Sustainable nanotechnology requires a scientifically based and proportionate risk governance structure to support innovation, including a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods established for conventional chemicals to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Exposure assessment developed as a tiered approach is equally beneficial to nano-specific ERA as for other classes of chemicals. Here we present the developing knowledge, practical considerations and key principles need to support exposure assessment for engineered nanomaterials for regulatory and research applications.

AB - Nanotechnology is identified as a key enabling technology due to its potential to contribute to economic growth and societal well-being across industrial sectors. Sustainable nanotechnology requires a scientifically based and proportionate risk governance structure to support innovation, including a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods established for conventional chemicals to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Exposure assessment developed as a tiered approach is equally beneficial to nano-specific ERA as for other classes of chemicals. Here we present the developing knowledge, practical considerations and key principles need to support exposure assessment for engineered nanomaterials for regulatory and research applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089478857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

DO - 10.1038/s41565-020-0742-1

M3 - Review article

C2 - 32807878

SN - 1748-3387

VL - 15

SP - 731

EP - 742

JO - Nature Nanotechnology

JF - Nature Nanotechnology

IS - 9

ER -

Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this