Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Key clinical findings from the IMPROVE-UK quality improvement projects: An overview

  • Andrew James Phillips*
  • , Rebecca Bowen
  • , Mary Wells
  • , Iain McNeish
  • , Sudha Sundar
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Survival from ovarian cancer in the UK is poor compared with international comparators. The Ovarian Cancer Audit Feasibility Pilot demonstrated variation in 1-year and 5-year survival across the UK as well as significant variation in treatment rates. In 2020, IMPROVE-UK was established as the first major programme to address inequalities in ovarian cancer management and survival across the UK, to develop a legacy of best practice sharing across the country and to establish and evaluate quality improvement projects that could drive care at scale.

Methods: Following a competitive process, seven quality improvement projects were funded to address inequalities in care and identify strategies to improve and equalise survival rates for all women with ovarian cancer in the UK, to address health inequalities from geography, age or ethnicity.

Results: Projects addressed the secondary care diagnostic pathway, genomic testing, prehabilitation and improving treatment-related decision-making, particularly decisions for surgery. All seven projects at least partial achieved their aims with numerous areas across all projects identified where processes could be refined and incorporated into standard care to improve outcomes of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Dissemination of information regarding best practice has been undertaken.

Conclusion: IMPROVE-UK was the first programme of its kind addressing significant inequalities of care in women with ovarian cancer. We demonstrate systematic quality improvement projects in ovarian cancer targeting various aspects of the treatment journey. Scaling up the results of the improve UK pilots is likely to improve survival in the UK and potentially internationally.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere002902
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ open quality
Volume14
Issue numberSuppl 1
Early online date25 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Health Equity
  • Implementation science
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Key clinical findings from the IMPROVE-UK quality improvement projects: An overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this