Abstract
This paper develops a thread of argument from previous contributions to this journal by Richard Smith and Ruth Cigman about the educational salience of self-esteem. It is argued - contra Smith and Cigman - that the social science conception of self-esteem does serve a useful educational function, most importantly in undermining the inflated self-help conception of self-esteem that has commonly been transposed to the educational arena. Recent findings about a lack of significant correlation between low global self-esteem and relevant educational variables help us to focus on the type of self-esteem that does matter in the classroom: justified domain-specific self-esteem, in which the chief domains in question are the school subjects and students' self-respect. Moreover, this paper suggests that low self-confidence - which is a real problem for many students - may often be mistaken for low self-esteem.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 247-261 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Philosophy of Education |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2007 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Justified self-esteem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver