Is it oral or vaginal; and should it be misoprostol or dinoprostone for cervical ripening?: how to interpret a network meta-analysis

Is it oral or vaginal; and should it be misoprostol or dinoprostone for cervical ripening? how to interpret a network meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	355
Journal	BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume	123
Issue number	3
Early online date	5 Nov 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13533
Publication status	Published - Feb 2016

This is a mini commentary on W Chen et al. pp. 346–354 in this issue. To view this article visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13456.

@article{35c3824c20334355a77ee1edfa1416e4,

title = "Is it oral or vaginal; and should it be misoprostol or dinoprostone for cervical ripening?: how to interpret a network meta-analysis",

author = "K Hemming and M Price",

note = "This is a mini commentary on W Chen et al. pp. 346–354 in this issue. To view this article visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13456.",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.13533",

language = "English",

volume = "123",

pages = "355",

journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics \& Gynaecology",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it oral or vaginal; and should it be misoprostol or dinoprostone for cervical ripening?

T2 - how to interpret a network meta-analysis

AU - Hemming, K

AU - Price, M

N1 - This is a mini commentary on W Chen et al. pp. 346–354 in this issue. To view this article visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13456.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.13533

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.13533

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 26538480

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 123

SP - 355

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

IS - 3

ER -