TY - JOUR
T1 - Indication and outcome of repeat large loop excision biopsies of the cervix.
AU - Moss, Esther
AU - Appleyard, Tracy-Louise
AU - Winning, JM
AU - Jones, PW
AU - Luesley, David
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION.: To investigate the indications for performing a second large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) biopsy and to compare the associated colposcopic and pathological findings and treatment morbidity compared with 1 LLETZ. METHODS.: This is a case-control study that reviewed case notes and histology reports on women who had undergone 1 LLETZ biopsy (control group) and women who had undergone 2 biopsies (index group). A comparison of referral cytology, colposcopic findings, and pathological and clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS.: Of the women who went on to have 2 LLETZ biopsies, 88% had histologically proven high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or invasion on their first biopsy. A significantly greater proportion of high-grade cytologic and histologic diagnoses were associated with the first LLETZ compared with the second LLETZ biopsy, 76.5% and 69.1% versus 39.5% and 30.9%, respectively. A significantly greater proportion of women in the control group were referred with low-grade cytology (28.0%) and were diagnosed with human papillomavirus/low-grade CIN on histology (31.7%) compared with the first cytologic and LLETZ results in the index group, 9.9% and 8.6%, respectively. Complications were low in both groups; the immediate complication rate was 4% after the first LLETZ compared with 1% after the second LLETZ. CONCLUSIONS.: Most second LLETZ biopsies are performed in women with a history of biopsy-proven high-grade CIN and are not associated with an increased risk of immediate complications.
AB - INTRODUCTION.: To investigate the indications for performing a second large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) biopsy and to compare the associated colposcopic and pathological findings and treatment morbidity compared with 1 LLETZ. METHODS.: This is a case-control study that reviewed case notes and histology reports on women who had undergone 1 LLETZ biopsy (control group) and women who had undergone 2 biopsies (index group). A comparison of referral cytology, colposcopic findings, and pathological and clinical outcomes was performed. RESULTS.: Of the women who went on to have 2 LLETZ biopsies, 88% had histologically proven high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or invasion on their first biopsy. A significantly greater proportion of high-grade cytologic and histologic diagnoses were associated with the first LLETZ compared with the second LLETZ biopsy, 76.5% and 69.1% versus 39.5% and 30.9%, respectively. A significantly greater proportion of women in the control group were referred with low-grade cytology (28.0%) and were diagnosed with human papillomavirus/low-grade CIN on histology (31.7%) compared with the first cytologic and LLETZ results in the index group, 9.9% and 8.6%, respectively. Complications were low in both groups; the immediate complication rate was 4% after the first LLETZ compared with 1% after the second LLETZ. CONCLUSIONS.: Most second LLETZ biopsies are performed in women with a history of biopsy-proven high-grade CIN and are not associated with an increased risk of immediate complications.
U2 - 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f1ab95
DO - 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181f1ab95
M3 - Article
C2 - 21169867
SN - 1526-0976
VL - 15
SP - 89
EP - 92
JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
IS - 2
ER -