Abstract
Juliette Goldman and Christine Collier have recently proposed that the editor of Sex Education should adopt a policy of replacing the phrase 'opposite sex' with 'other sex' in all published articles, on the grounds that the word 'opposite' has connotations of hostility or adversity. In this brief reply I argue that their reasoning does not stand up to scrutiny and that their proposal ought therefore to be rejected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-104 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Sex Education |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2007 |