Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implementation of transcutaneous ultrasound-guided axillary vein access for implantations, revisions and upgrades of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a large tertiary care center

  • Julius Nikorowitsch*
  • , Tahsin Üctas
  • , Katrin Borof
  • , Andreas Metzner
  • , Jan-Per Wenzel
  • , Simon Julius Winkelmann
  • , Simon Pecha
  • , Yalin Yildirim
  • , Hermann Reichenspurner
  • , Paulus Kirchhof
  • , Tobias Tönnis
  • , Nina Becher
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Central venous access for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations is conventionally acquired via the cephalic or subclavian vein. Controlled data suggest that axillary vein access may reduce complications.

Objectives
: We, therefore, shifted institutional practice from subclavian vein access to ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein access for new implantations and revisions or upgrades and report on implant success rates, learning curves and periprocedural complications.

Methods
: Between January 2021 and August 2023, all patients undergoing CIED implantations, revisions or upgrades were analyzed. US-guided axillary access was introduced starting with one operator and spreading to most operators and trainees thereafter. Periprocedural outcomes and complications (pocket hematoma, hemothorax, and pneumothorax) of transcutaneous US-guided axillary vein access were compared to the subclavian vein access.

Results
: In this study, 986 patients (median age: 75 years, interquartile range (IQR) 64–82 years, 35% women) with 87% new implantations and 13% revisions or upgrades were included. Transcutaneous US-guided axillary access was successful in 535/578 patients (93%), subclavian vein access in 400/408 patients (98%) (p < 0.001). For device upgrades or revisions specifically, axillary access was successful in 69/79 patients (87%), versus 45/47 patients (96%) with subclavian access (p = 0.208). The learning curve for axillary access was steep with success rates of 93 after 30 cases per operator. Complications occurred in 2/578 patients (0.3%) undergoing axillary vein access versus 17/408 patients (4.2%) (p < 0.001) undergoing subclavian vein access.

Conclusion
: The implementation of transcutaneous US-guided axillary vein access for implantation, revisions and upgrades of cardiac electronic devices is feasible in a large tertiary care center. The periprocedural complications are rare. 
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)590-601
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Volume115
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • Ultrasound-guided (US)
  • Cardiac implantable electronic devices
  • Device complications
  • Pacemaker
  • Venous access

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of transcutaneous ultrasound-guided axillary vein access for implantations, revisions and upgrades of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a large tertiary care center'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this