Human error identification techniques applied to public technology: Predictions compared with observed use

C. Baber*, N. A. Stanton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the use of human error identification (HEI) techniques as a possible alternative to observation studies for product evaluation. The HEI techniques used were Task Analysis for Error Identification (TAFEI) and Predictive Human Error Analysis (PHEA). The comparison was undertaken in connection with the prediction of errors in the use of a ticket vending machine. Two main findings emerged from the study. First, predictions derived from the HEI techniques compared favourably with errors observed in-actual machine use. Second, the HEI techniques took far less time than direct observation to reach comparable levels of performance. Such rates suggest that these techniques can be usefully applied to the study of consumer products.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-131
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1996

Keywords

  • Error identification
  • Product evaluation
  • Public technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human error identification techniques applied to public technology: Predictions compared with observed use'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this