Abstract
Reports produced in response to the need for health technology assessment (HTA) vary greatly in the methods they use, depending on the decision-maker's needs, the technology's characteristics and the resources available. HTA reports vary from the brief, such as 'vignettes' produced when a new technology emerges, to the exhaustive, such as 'Cochrane reviews' synthesising a mature evidence base. They may address a wide range of different questions. 'Classic HTAs', typically those reports prepared to support NICE appraisal decisions, seek to use scientifically rigorous methods to address a focused policy question. These are based on systematic reviews of the effectiveness evidence but this is often fed into economic models, in order to generate estimates of cost-effectiveness. Future developments in HTA responses will reflect both the embedding of systematic methods and a growing responsiveness to customer needs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 102-106 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Health Medicine |
| Volume | 25 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2003 |
Keywords
- cost effectiveness
- decision making
- methodology
- systematic review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'HTA responses and the classic HTA report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver