How do we perceive North Korea: A comparison of three models of stereotype threat

C Myers, Dominic Abrams, H Rosenthal, Julie Christian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Integrated threat theory, realistic conflict theory, and group justification (based on social identity theory) were evaluated in the international context of Japanese prejudice toward North Korea and South Korea. Military threat emerged as an important addition to the four threats outlined by integrated threat theory. Three perceived North Korean threats (realistic [domestic] threat; intergroup anxiety; military threat) predicted prejudice toward North Korea. North Korean prejudice predicted negative stereotypes, supporting group-justification theory. Perceived North Korean realistic [domestic] threat predicted prejudice toward South Korea. Prejudice toward South Korea predicted negative stereotypes of North Korea, suggesting a mechanism by which prejudice generalizes.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Research in Social Psychology
Volume20
Issue number07
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do we perceive North Korea: A comparison of three models of stereotype threat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this