History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture

Melina Kunar, Glyn Humphreys, Kelly Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)


Visual search for a conjunction target is made easier when distractor items are temporally segregated over time to produce two separate old and new groups (the new group containing the target item). The benefit of presenting half the distractors first is known as the preview effect. Recently some researchers have argued that the preview effect occurs because new stimuli capture attention. This account was tested in the present study by using a novel "top-up" condition that exploits the fact that when previews appear only briefly before the search display, there is minimal preview benefit. We show that effects of a brief preview can be "topped up" by an earlier exposure of the same items, even when the preview disappears between its first and second presentations. This top-up effect demonstrates that the history of the old stimuli is important for the preview benefit, contrary to the account favoring onset capture. We discuss alternative accounts of how the preview benefit arises.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-185
Number of pages5
JournalPsychological Science
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2003


Dive into the research topics of 'History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this