Hirst on rational moral education

Michael Hand*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Moral Education in a Secular Society, Paul Hirst offers accounts of the content and justification of morality and the aims and methods of moral education. My own recent book, A Theory of Moral Education, does the same. Here I explore the similarities and differences between our theories. In the first part of the paper, I outline what Hirst calls the ‘sophisticated view of education’, which I wholeheartedly endorse, and highlight his attention to the noncognitive as well as the cognitive aspects of morality. In the second part, I explain how Hirst’s transcendental justification of morality differs from my contractarian justification, and trace the implications of this difference for our respective accounts of moral education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-322
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
Volume57
Issue number1
Early online date12 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Keywords

  • morality
  • moral education
  • Paul Hirst
  • transcendental deduction
  • contractarian justification
  • practical deliberation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hirst on rational moral education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this