Abstract
Drawing on the author's previous and current fieldwork in Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) and interactions with several non-governmental organizations (NGOs), this article asks whether some organizations that seek to help and support victims/-survivors of conflict-related sexual violence are potentially doing more harm than good. In developing this argument, the article's aim is neither to unjustly criticize NGOs nor to trivialize the challenges that victims/-survivors face. What it seeks to demonstrate, however, is that a heavy focus on the thematic of trauma can be counter-productive. Specifically, it critiques trauma as a disempowering, essentializing and collectivizing discourse. Calling for a meta discursive shift away from trauma and towards resilience, it argues that NGOs should give more attention to the families and communities of victims/-survivors. Families and communities, in this regard, constitute potential resilience resources that should be harnessed and strengthened.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 246-265 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Human Rights |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Helping or harming? NGOs and victims/-survivors of conflict-related sexual violence in Bosnia-Herzegovina'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Research data supporting 'A comparative study of resilience in survivors of conflict-related sexual violence: New directions for transitional justice'
Clark, J. (Creator), Nieto Valdivieso, Y. (Creator) & Apio, E. (Creator), University of Birmingham, 5 Aug 2021
DOI: 10.25500/edata.bham.00000705
Dataset
Equipment
-
Birmingham Environment for Academic Research (BEAR)
Facility/equipment: Equipment