Has Labour decentralised the NHS? Terminological obfuscation and analytical confusion

I Greener, Mark Exworthy, Stephen Peckham, M Powell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


This article considers the rise of decentralisation as an approach to public-sector reform generally, and its approach to the British National Health Service (NHS) specifically. It suggests that the term 'decentralisation' is often so poorly defined that reforms made in its name cannot be assessed to see if they have achieved it as a goal or not. The article explores the meanings of decentralisation and attempts to clarify it, before going on to examine, through a review of what four key commentators have said about it, how health reform under the British New Labour government, despite often claiming to be decentralising, has often been centralising instead. The article presents a framework for assessing claims of decentralisation in public reform more generally, before presenting a specific example from the NH
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-454
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy Studies
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Has Labour decentralised the NHS? Terminological obfuscation and analytical confusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this