Guidelines versus practice: UK asthma nurses often recommend intermittent, symptom-driven use of inhaled corticosteroids

M.E. Hyland, S. Blake, C.J. Greaves, M. Pinnuck, C. Seamark, D. Seamark, D. Ward, D.M.G. Halpin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent clinical trials suggest that intermittent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is safe for mild persistent asthma. Intermittent ICS use is inconsistent with current guidelines but is a common form of non-compliance. The aim of this study was to investigate how asthma nurses advise patients to use ICS.

Methods: Practice managers of 241 GP surgeries in the southwest of England were sent questionnaires to distribute to practice nurses.

Results: Questionnaires were returned by 105 nurses (104 had asthma-specific training). There was a wide variation in attitudes to guideline-based care and advice given to patients. 97% indicated that they sometimes advised patients to decrease their ICS use, 85% sometimes advised patients to stop their ICS when their asthma was well controlled, and 70% reported sometimes advising intermittent use.

Conclusion: Asthma nurse recommendations are often inconsistent with guidelines. There is considerable variation between different asthma nurses in the advice given to patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-117
Number of pages4
JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Guidelines
  • compliance
  • nurse management
  • adherence
  • concordance
  • asthma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines versus practice: UK asthma nurses often recommend intermittent, symptom-driven use of inhaled corticosteroids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this