Abstract
The introduction of individual budgets into English health care is a recent example of the pervasive drive towards personalisation in welfare sector organisation and delivery. As a heavily centralised and highly bureaucratic institution, the National Health Service (NHS) is an obvious target for personalisation. On the other hand, as a symbol of solidarity and nationhood it retains a powerful place within the collective psyche, such that radical reform might expect to encounter resistance. This paper analyses the assumptions that are inherent in personalisation and raises concerns over its ability to transform health-care services. At the heart of these concerns is the tension between appeals to tailored service provision and empowerment on the one hand, and promotion of a strong social contract, public trust in institutions, and collective identity on the other. Lessons are drawn for personalisation in other sectors and settings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 149-158 |
| Journal | Australian Journal Of Public Administration |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 15 May 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- health policy
- individual budgets
- English National Health Service
- personal health budgets
- personalisation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Going it alone or playing to the crowd? A critique of individual budgets and the personalisation of Health Care in the English National Health Service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver