Abstract
Globalization has been facing a backlash. By contrast, entrepreneurship has come to be seen as a panacea for economic development and generating jobs that are perceived to be under threat from globalization. In this Perspectives paper, our central argument is that globalization and entrepreneurship must be viewed holistically, recognizing that globalization is an enabler of important entrepreneurship outcomes. We argue that networks created as a byproduct of globalization facilitate various forms of entrepreneurship. Interpersonal networks (e.g., diasporas) facilitate transnational entrepreneurship which can, in turn, reduce institutional distance between locations. Interorganizational networks (e.g., MNE-orchestrated ecosystems) facilitate technology entrepreneurship which reinforces the institutional work that gives rise to new technological domains and fields. Intergovernmental and civil society networks facilitate social entrepreneurship which helps redress institutional voids. Thus globalization can be a force for good by enabling forms of entrepreneurship that enable important institutional change. We highlight the importance of paradox thinking, which is rooted in ancient Chinese philosophy, in transcending an either/or perspective of globalization and entrepreneurship.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Asia Pacific Journal of Management |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Keywords
- Anti-globalization
- Entrepreneurship
- Globalization
- Institutional change
- International entrepreneurship
- Paradox thinking
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
- Strategy and Management