Global uncertainty in the diagnosis of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection by both neurologists and non-neurologists: An international inter-observer variability study

  • Global NeuroResearch Coalition
  • , A. A. Tamborska
  • , G. K. Wood
  • , E. Westenberg
  • , D. Garcia-Azorin
  • , G. Webb
  • , N. Schiess
  • , M. Netravathi
  • , B. Baykan
  • , R. Dervaj
  • , R. Helbok
  • , S. Lant
  • , A. Özge
  • , A. Padovani
  • , D. Saylor
  • , E. Schmutzhard
  • , A. Easton
  • , J. B. Lilleker
  • , T. Jackson
  • , E. Beghi
  • M. A. Ellul, J. A. Frontera, T. Pollak, T. R. Nicholson, N. Wood, K. T. Thakur, T. Solomon, R. J. Stark, A. S. Winkler, B. D. Michael*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Uniform case definitions are required to ensure harmonised reporting of neurological syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, it is unclear how clinicians perceive the relative importance of SARS-CoV-2 in neurological syndromes, which risks under- or over-reporting.

Methods: We invited clinicians through global networks, including the World Federation of Neurology, to assess ten anonymised vignettes of SARS-CoV-2 neurological syndromes. Using standardised case definitions, clinicians assigned a diagnosis and ranked association with SARS-CoV-2. We compared diagnostic accuracy and assigned association ranks between different settings and specialties and calculated inter-rater agreement for case definitions as “poor” (κ ≤ 0.4), “moderate” or “good” (κ > 0.6).

Results: 1265 diagnoses were assigned by 146 participants from 45 countries on six continents. The highest correct proportion were cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST, 95.8%), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS, 92.4%) and headache (91.6%) and the lowest encephalitis (72.8%), psychosis (53.8%) and encephalopathy (43.2%). Diagnostic accuracy was similar between neurologists and non-neurologists (median score 8 vs. 7/10, p = 0.1). Good inter-rater agreement was observed for five diagnoses: cranial neuropathy, headache, myelitis, CVST, and GBS and poor agreement for encephalopathy. In 13% of vignettes, clinicians incorrectly assigned lowest association ranks, regardless of setting and specialty.

Conclusion: The case definitions can help with reporting of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2, also in settings with few neurologists. However, encephalopathy, encephalitis, and psychosis were often misdiagnosed, and clinicians underestimated the association with SARS-CoV-2. Future work should refine the case definitions and provide training if global reporting of neurological syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 is to be robust.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120646
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume449
Early online date11 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Diagnosis
  • Inter-rater agreement
  • Neurology
  • SARS-CoV-2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global uncertainty in the diagnosis of neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection by both neurologists and non-neurologists: An international inter-observer variability study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this