Abstract
Hong Kong and Macao are featured with their urban metabolism as they heavily rely on the energy and resource supply from other regions. However, a comprehensive perspective is lacked to depict their CO2 emissions due to the independence of statistical data. Here we analyze the carbon footprints of Hong Kong and Macao. The direct energy-related emissions (Scope 1), the emissions of cross-boundary electricity (Scope 2), and the embodied emissions associated with trade (Scope 3) are examined. Scope 1 carbon footprints of the two areas were stabilized at 50 Mt, accounting for 0.6% of those from Mainland China in 2018. Their global footprints were approximately three times of their Scope 1 emissions, accompanied by a continuous growth between 2000 and 2015, and the contribution of their local footprints has doubled on average. Their Scope 3 emissions were mainly due to the enormous unfavorable balance of trade. Meanwhile, the increasing impact of imports’ higher emission intensity on their Scope 3 emissions should not be ignored. We suggest that Hong Kong and Macao should adjust their mitigation policies that focus only on Scope 1 emissions as developed cities outsourcing production through supply chains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 105167 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Resources, Conservation and Recycling |
| Volume | 164 |
| Early online date | 5 Oct 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Keywords
- Carbon footprint
- Three scopes emissions
- Urban metabolism
- Hong Kong
- Macao
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Global and local carbon footprints of city of Hong Kong and Macao from 2000 to 2015'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver