Abstract
This report explores the advantages and disadvantages of concentrating versus spreading public funding across different geographical areas. It highlights the importance of considering both approaches systematically in relation to specific policy areas and their intended outcomes. The report emphasises the need for accountable and transparent governance processes, robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks, and increased investment in local institutions to enhance policymaking and delivery capacity.
This report is for the Improving Public Funding Allocations to Reduce Geographical Inequalities project funded by the ESRC.
The project brings together a highly experienced interdisciplinary team from the Universities of Birmingham, Bristol, De Montfort, Newcastle, Nottingham, Plymouth and Sheffield, together with the National Centre for Social Research and Metro Dynamics.
This report is for the Improving Public Funding Allocations to Reduce Geographical Inequalities project funded by the ESRC.
The project brings together a highly experienced interdisciplinary team from the Universities of Birmingham, Bristol, De Montfort, Newcastle, Nottingham, Plymouth and Sheffield, together with the National Centre for Social Research and Metro Dynamics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- Funding
- Devolution
- Local goverment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Geographically concentrating or spreading public funding?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver