Abstract
There is a long-standing assumption that gestural forms are geared by a set of modes of representation (acting, representing, drawing, moulding) with each technique expressing speakers’ focus of attention on specific aspects of referents (Müller, 2013). Beyond different taxonomies describing the modes of representation, it remains unclear what factors motivate certain depicting techniques over others. Results from a pantomime generation task show that pantomimes are not entirely idiosyncratic but rather follow generalisable patterns constrained by their semantic category. We show that a) specific modes of representations are preferred for certain objects (acting for manipulable objects and drawing for non-manipulable objects); and b) that use and ordering of deictics and modes of representation operate in tandem to distinguish between semantically related concepts (e.g., “to drink” vs “mug”). This study provides yet more evidence that our ability to communicate through silent gesture reveals systematic ways to describe events and objects around us
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society |
Editors | A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, J. Trueswell |
Place of Publication | Austin, Texas |
Publisher | Cognitive Science Society |
Pages | 1182-1187 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780991196739 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society - Philadelphia Convention Center , Philadelphia, United States Duration: 10 Aug 2016 → 13 Aug 2016 |
Conference
Conference | 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CogSci 2016 |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Philadelphia |
Period | 10/08/16 → 13/08/16 |
Keywords
- gesture
- iconicity
- language evolution