Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation

Asgher Champsi, Alastair Mobley, Anuradhaa Subramanian, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Xiaoxia Wang, David Shukla, Karina Bunting, Inge Molgaard, Jeremy Dwight, Ruben Casado Arroyo, Harry J G M Crijns, Luigina Guasti, Maddalena Lettino, R Thomas Lumbers, Bart Maesen, Michiel Rienstra, Emma Svennberg, Otilia Tica, Vassil Traykov, Stylianos TzeisIsabelle van Gelder, Dipak Kotecha*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Aims: The role of gender in decision-making for oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial.

Methods: Population cohort study using electronic healthcare records of 16,587,749 patients from UK primary care (2005-2020). Primary (composite of all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke or arterial thromboembolism) and secondary outcomes were analysed using Cox hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for age, socioeconomic status and comorbidities.

Results: 78,852 patients were included with AF, age 40-75 years, no prior stroke and no prescription of oral anticoagulants. 28,590 (36.3%) were women and 50,262 (63.7%) men. Median age was 65.7 years (interquartile range 58.5-70.9) with women being older and other differences in comorbidities. During total follow-up of 431,086 patient-years, women had a lower adjusted primary outcome rate with HR 0.89 vs men (95% CI 0.87-0.92; p<0.001), and HR 0.87 after censoring for oral anticoagulation (95% CI 0.83-0.91; p<0.001). This was driven by lower mortality in women (HR 0.86, 0.83-0.89; p<0.001). No difference was identified between women and men for the secondary outcomes of ischaemic stroke or arterial thromboembolism (adjusted HR 1.00, 0.94-1.07; p=0.87), any stroke or any thromboembolism (1.02, 0.96-1.07; p=0.58), and incident vascular dementia (1.13, 0.97-1.32; p=0.11). Clinical risk scores were only modest predictors of outcomes, with CHA2DS2-VA (ignoring gender) superior to CHA2DS2-VASc for primary outcomes in this population (receiver operator curve area 0.651 vs 0.639; p<0.001), and no interaction with gender (p=0.45).

Conclusions: Removal of gender from clinical risk scoring could simplify the approach to which patients with AF should be offered oral anticoagulation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberehae539
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume45
Issue number36
Early online date1 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Gender
  • Women
  • Sex
  • Stroke
  • Thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this