Abstract
Three experiments examined nonspatial extinction in G.K., a patient with bilateral parietal damage. Experiment 1 demonstrated nonspatial extinction (poor detection of a weak relative to a stronger perceptual group), even when the stronger group was less complex than the weaker group. Experiment 2 showed improved report of a letter falling at the location of the stronger group, but explicit judgments of the location of the letter were at chance. Experiment 3 replicated the object-cuing benefit, though G.K. could not discriminate whether a letter fell at the same location as the stronger perceptual group. The data indicate coupling between object- and space-based attention, so that spatial attention is drawn to the location occupied by the winner of object-based competition for selection. In this case, what cues where. This coupling operates implicitly, even when explicit location judgments are impaired.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 487-492 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Psychological Science |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From what to where: Neuropsychological evidence for implicit interactions between object- and space-based attention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver