Abstract
In this article, Kazantzakis' popularity over the years is briefly reviewed and it is argued that the two dominant approaches to his work, which could be described as ethnograpbic and philosophical-theological, respectively, correspond to the antithesis between being and becoming. The question addressed here is whether we can read his fiction in a new, way, and pass from the ontology of being to the contingency of becoming, following the example of the process theologians who brought him closer to postmodernism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 83-91 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2009 |