Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Foaming honey: particle or molecular foaming agent?

  • Andrew T. Tyowua*
  • , Adebukola M. Echendu
  • , Stephen G. Yiase
  • , Sylvester O. Adejo
  • , Luter Leke
  • , Emmanuel M. Mbawuaga
  • , Bernard P. Binks
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Honey foam was prepared using particle (precipitated CaCO3) or molecular (sodium lauryl sulfate) foaming agent. We noted the foam volume and the time it took a foam sample to collapse completely so as to determine the best foaming agent. Foams were prepared by aerating honey in the presence of varying concentrations of the particles or sodium lauryl sulfate. Aqueous foams were similarly prepared for comparison. Sodium lauryl sulfate gave a higher volume of honey foam, which did not collapse completely for more than 4 months compared with precipitated CaCO3 particles which gave a smaller foam volume that collapsed completely within 4 weeks. Aqueous foams prepared from the surfactant, by contrast, collapsed completely within three hours while those prepared from the particles did not collapse within the same timeframe. This shows that the surfactant is a better foaming agent in honey compared with the particles, while the particles are a better foaming agent in water compared with the surfactant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-858
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Dispersion Science and Technology
Volume43
Issue number6
Early online date1 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • foam stabilization
  • honey
  • honey foam
  • small solid particle
  • Surfactant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Polymers and Plastics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foaming honey: particle or molecular foaming agent?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this