Abstract
This article argues that the four main measures introduced in the 2014 reform of the Procurement Directives to promote Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) cannot be classified as measures favouring SMEs. A measure favours SMEs when it compromises the main objectives of competition, non-discrimination and value for money. The discussion covers the regimes on the division of larger contracts into lots, the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), minimum turnover requirements, and direct payments to subcontractors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 224-238 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Jul 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Small and Medium Enterprises
- Public Procurement
- EU Law
- EU Directive 2014/24/EU
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Favouring Small and Medium Sized Enterprises with Directive 2014/24/EU?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver