Family network typologies of adults with intellectual disability: Associations with psychological outcomes

  • Tess Tournier*
  • , Alexander H.C. Hendriks
  • , Andrew Jahoda
  • , Richard P. Hastings
  • , Sanne A.H. Giesbers
  • , Ad A. Vermulst
  • , Petri J.C.M. Embregts
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Based on self-reported social capital, different typologies of family networks of people with intellectual disabilities were examined. Associations between behavioural and emotional problems or well-being and typologies were investigated. 

Method: 137 participants with mild intellectual disability were interviewed using the Family Network Method-Intellectual Disability to assess their emotionally supportive family relationships. Data on participants’ well-being and behavioural and emotional problems were also gathered. Latent class analysis was used to identify family typologies based on social network measures. 

Results: Four distinguishable typologies were identified, two supportive and two less supportive. A small association was found with behavioural and emotional problems and one of the supportive typologies. Associations with constructs of well-being were found for both supportive and less supportive typologies. 

Conclusions: A variety of family types were found, with implications for sensitive professional support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-76
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date25 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

  • family relations
  • latent class analysis
  • social capital
  • social networks
  • social support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Family network typologies of adults with intellectual disability: Associations with psychological outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this