Abstract
Because few manuscripts of the NT writings are preserved from the first three centuries of the Christian era, scholars have debated the extent that modern critical editions of the NT reflect the text in circulation during these early centuries. In order to answer this question, this article will set out the evidence for ancient publication through community transmission. It will consider examples from Cicero, Martial, Quintilian, Pliny the Younger and Galen. These authors reveal that they preferred social networks rather than commercial dealers to circulate their writings. These same communities that copied and distributed an author’s works inadvertently created an environment in which significant alterations and plagiarizing of these same writings became known. Matthew D.C. Larsen, who has recently approached the same problem addressed in this article by examining ancient publication conventions, is engaged with throughout. The conclusions drawn here press hard against Larsen’s assertions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 266-298 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | Journal for the Study of the New Testament |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 13 Oct 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Ancient publication
- community
- textual corruption
- textual criticism
- textual stability
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious studies