Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks

Christopher Skelcher, Erik-Hans Klijn, D Kübler, E Sørensen, Helen Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

328 Downloads (Pure)


Advances in understanding the democratic anchorage of governance networks require carefully designed and contextually grounded empirical analysis that take into account contextual factors. The article uses a conjectural framework to study the impact of the national ‘democratic milieu’ on the relationship between network governance and representative institutions in four European countries - the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Denmark. The article shows that the distinction between majoritarian and consensus democracy, as well as the varying strength of voluntary associations are important contextual factors that help understand cross-national differences in the relationship between governance networks and representative institutions. We conclude that a context of weak associationalism in majoritarian democracies facilitates the instrumentalization of networks by governmental actors (United Kingdom), whereas while in consensus democracies a more complementary role of governance networks prevails (Switzerland). However, in consensus democracies characterised by a context of strong associationalism (the Netherlands and Denmark), the spread of governance networks in public policy-making is likely to lead to more substantial transformations of the democratic processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-38
Number of pages32
JournalAdministrative Theory & Praxis
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this