TY - JOUR
T1 - Exercise for multiple sclerosis: a single-blind randomized trial comparing three exercise intensities
AU - Collett, J
AU - Dawes, H
AU - Meaney, A
AU - Sackley, Catherine
AU - Barker, K
AU - Wade, D
AU - Izardi, H
AU - Bateman, J
AU - Duda, Joan
AU - Buckingham, E
PY - 2011/5/1
Y1 - 2011/5/1
N2 - Background: The most effective exercise dose has yet to be established for multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different exercise intensities in people with MS.
Methods: We completed a randomized comparator study of three cycling exercise intensities, with blinded assessment, was carried out in Oxford. Sixty-one adults with MS who fulfilled inclusion criteria were randomized at entry into the study, using a computer-generated list held by an exercise professional, into either: continuous (at 45% peak power, n=20), intermittent (30 sec on, 30 sec off at 90% peak power, n=21) or combined (10 min intermittent at 90% peak power then 10 min continuous at 45% peak power, n=20) exercise for 20 min twice a week for 12 weeks in a leisure facility. Groups were assessed at: baseline, halfway (6 weeks), end intervention (12 weeks) and follow-up (24 weeks). Primary outcome measure was 2 min walk.
Results: Fifty-five participants were included in the analysis (n= continuous 20, intermittent 18, combined 17). No differences were found between groups. After 6 weeks, considering all participants, 2 min walk distance increased by 6.96 +/- 2.56m (95% CI: 1.81 to 12.10, effect size (es): 0.25, p
AB - Background: The most effective exercise dose has yet to be established for multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different exercise intensities in people with MS.
Methods: We completed a randomized comparator study of three cycling exercise intensities, with blinded assessment, was carried out in Oxford. Sixty-one adults with MS who fulfilled inclusion criteria were randomized at entry into the study, using a computer-generated list held by an exercise professional, into either: continuous (at 45% peak power, n=20), intermittent (30 sec on, 30 sec off at 90% peak power, n=21) or combined (10 min intermittent at 90% peak power then 10 min continuous at 45% peak power, n=20) exercise for 20 min twice a week for 12 weeks in a leisure facility. Groups were assessed at: baseline, halfway (6 weeks), end intervention (12 weeks) and follow-up (24 weeks). Primary outcome measure was 2 min walk.
Results: Fifty-five participants were included in the analysis (n= continuous 20, intermittent 18, combined 17). No differences were found between groups. After 6 weeks, considering all participants, 2 min walk distance increased by 6.96 +/- 2.56m (95% CI: 1.81 to 12.10, effect size (es): 0.25, p
KW - randomized trial
KW - exercise
KW - multiple sclerosis
KW - mobility
KW - dose
KW - rehabilitation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79961153844
U2 - 10.1177/1352458510391836
DO - 10.1177/1352458510391836
M3 - Article
C2 - 21247971
SN - 1477-0970
VL - 17
SP - 594
EP - 603
JO - Multiple Sclerosis
JF - Multiple Sclerosis
IS - 5
ER -