TY - JOUR
T1 - Evapotranspiration simulations in ISIMIP2a - Evaluation of spatio-temporal characteristics with a comprehensive ensemble of independent datasets
AU - Wartenburger, Richard
AU - Seneviratne, Sonia
AU - Hirschi, Martin
AU - Chang, Jinfeng
AU - Ciais, Philippe
AU - Deryng, Delphine
AU - Elliott, Joshua
AU - Folberth, Christian
AU - Gosling, Simon
AU - Gudmundsson, Lukas
AU - Henry, Alexandra
AU - Hickler, Thomas
AU - Ito, Akihiko
AU - Khabarov, Nikolai
AU - Kim, Hyungjun
AU - Guoyong, Leng
AU - Liu, Xingcai
AU - Masaki, Yoshimitsu
AU - Morfopoulos, Catherine
AU - Müller, Christoph
AU - Müller Schmied, Hannes
AU - Nishina, Kazuya
AU - Orth, Rene
AU - Pokhrel, Yadu
AU - Pugh, Thomas
AU - Satoh, Yusuke
AU - Schaphoff, Sibyll
AU - Schmid, Erwin
AU - Sheffield, Justin
AU - Stacke, Tobias
AU - Steinkamp, Joerg
AU - Tang, Qiuhong
AU - Thierry, Wim
AU - Wada, Yoshihide
AU - Wang, Xuhui
AU - Weedon, Graham
AU - Yang, Hong
AU - Zhou, Tian
AU - Liu, Junguo
PY - 2018/6/21
Y1 - 2018/6/21
N2 - Actual land evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of the global hydrological cycle and an essential variable determining the evolution of hydrological extreme events under different climate change scenarios. However, recently available ET products show persistent uncertainties that are impeding a precise attribution of human-induced climate change. Here, we aim at comparing a range of independent global monthly land ET estimates with historical model simulations from the global water, agriculture, and biomes sectors participating in the second phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2a). Among the independent estimates, we use the EartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset (E2O), two commonly used reanalyses, a pre-compiled ensemble product (LandFlux-EVAL), and an updated collection of recently published datasets that algorithmically derive ET from observations or observations-based estimates (diagnostic datasets). A cluster analysis is applied in order to identify spatio-temporal differences among all datasets and to thus identify factors that dominate overall uncertainties. The clustering is controlled by several factors including the model choice, the meteorological forcing used to drive the assessed models, the data category (models participating in the different sectors of ISIMIP2a, E2O models, diagnostic estimates, reanalysis-based estimates or composite products), the ET scheme, and the number of soil layers in the models. By using these factors to explain spatial and spatio-temporal variabilities in ET, we find that the model choice mostly dominates (24%–40% of variance explained), except for spatio-temporal patterns of total ET, where the forcing explains the largest fraction of the variance (29%). The most dominant clusters of datasets are further compared with individual diagnostic and reanalysis-based estimates to assess their representation of selected heat waves and droughts in the Great Plains, Central Europe and western Russia. Although most of the ET estimates capture these extreme events, the generally large spread among the entire ensemble indicates substantial uncertainties.
AB - Actual land evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of the global hydrological cycle and an essential variable determining the evolution of hydrological extreme events under different climate change scenarios. However, recently available ET products show persistent uncertainties that are impeding a precise attribution of human-induced climate change. Here, we aim at comparing a range of independent global monthly land ET estimates with historical model simulations from the global water, agriculture, and biomes sectors participating in the second phase of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2a). Among the independent estimates, we use the EartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset (E2O), two commonly used reanalyses, a pre-compiled ensemble product (LandFlux-EVAL), and an updated collection of recently published datasets that algorithmically derive ET from observations or observations-based estimates (diagnostic datasets). A cluster analysis is applied in order to identify spatio-temporal differences among all datasets and to thus identify factors that dominate overall uncertainties. The clustering is controlled by several factors including the model choice, the meteorological forcing used to drive the assessed models, the data category (models participating in the different sectors of ISIMIP2a, E2O models, diagnostic estimates, reanalysis-based estimates or composite products), the ET scheme, and the number of soil layers in the models. By using these factors to explain spatial and spatio-temporal variabilities in ET, we find that the model choice mostly dominates (24%–40% of variance explained), except for spatio-temporal patterns of total ET, where the forcing explains the largest fraction of the variance (29%). The most dominant clusters of datasets are further compared with individual diagnostic and reanalysis-based estimates to assess their representation of selected heat waves and droughts in the Great Plains, Central Europe and western Russia. Although most of the ET estimates capture these extreme events, the generally large spread among the entire ensemble indicates substantial uncertainties.
U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aac4bb
M3 - Article
SN - 1748-9326
VL - 13
JO - Environmental Research Letters
JF - Environmental Research Letters
IS - 7
M1 - 075001
ER -