European Arrest Warrants, the Rule of Law and Communication: What future for mutual recognition?

Kathrin Hamenstaedt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This contribution addresses the insistence of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the two-step test in the context of European Arrest Warrants (EAWs) and focuses on the advantages this approach offers whilst acknowledging its downsides. Crucially, the Court's approach keeps the vertical and horizontal channels of communication open and is flanked by a subtle broadening of the criteria, which the requested judicial authority can take into consideration when assessing the second limb of the test. This shift provides national judicial authorities with tools to respond to rule of law violations by refusing the execution of an EAW. This move to judicial subsidiarity creates pitfalls, but the Court's focus on communication has the potential to transform the Court's initial top-down approach to mutual trust into a bottom-up approach, which could foster the emergence of, and strengthen, real trust between national judicial authorities.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Early online date21 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • European Arrest Warrants
  • rule of law
  • mutual recognition
  • vertical communication
  • horizontal communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European Arrest Warrants, the Rule of Law and Communication: What future for mutual recognition?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this