Abstract
I discuss the authors’ criticisms of the utopian strand of enactivism and consider scientific practice through the lens of feminist philosophy of science. I argue that much enactivist work in cognitive science attempts to be utopian in a somewhat different sense from that used by the authors; enactive principles have been used to additionally critique and challenge overlooked political and social implications of cognitive science research. I conclude by asking, however, whether enactivism, over other cognitive models, is in a better place to make such critiques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 22-24 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Constructivist Foundations |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Vrije Universiteit Brussel. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- enactivism
- cognitive science
- philosophy of science
- feminist philosophy of science
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Enactivism as Utopian Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver