Abstract
Recent literature documents the pervasiveness of job polarization in the labor
markets of the developed world. However, relatively little is known about polarization on a sub-national level. We exploit extensive data on both genders from Statistics Netherlands to confirm polarization as an important trend in the Dutch national labor market between 1999 and 2012. Furthermore, our sub-national analysis reveals considerable spatial heterogeneity among local labor markets. The degree of urbanization plays an important role; regions that are initially more urbanized are more likely to exhibit polarization. Finally, using a skill-based approach we report evidence supporting the routinization hypothesis as an important source of polarization.
markets of the developed world. However, relatively little is known about polarization on a sub-national level. We exploit extensive data on both genders from Statistics Netherlands to confirm polarization as an important trend in the Dutch national labor market between 1999 and 2012. Furthermore, our sub-national analysis reveals considerable spatial heterogeneity among local labor markets. The degree of urbanization plays an important role; regions that are initially more urbanized are more likely to exhibit polarization. Finally, using a skill-based approach we report evidence supporting the routinization hypothesis as an important source of polarization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis |
| Pages | 48 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | CPB Discussion Papers |
|---|---|
| No. | 358 |
Keywords
- job polarisation
- regional analysis
- routine-biased technological change
- spatial heterogeneity