Emperor and Church in the Last Centuries of Byzantium

Ruth Macrides

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

    214 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study discusses relations between the Church and the emperor in the last two centuries of the Byzantine empire’s existence, in the Palaiologan period (thirteenth to fifteenth centuries). It questions the accepted view that the Church rose in importance and status as imperial power and authority declined. According to this view, expressed by Steven Runciman and accepted by historians since, a strong Church was the legacy of the Byzantine empire to the Ottomans. In this article the ceremonies of the late Byzantine court, as represented by the mid-fourteenth-century text of Pseudo-Kodinos, are examined for indications of continuity in the emperor’s dominant role in the Church in this later period. Gilbert Dagron’s contrary perspective is considered. It is then argued that the writings of two late Byzantine churchmen, Symeon of Thessalonike and Makarios of Antioch, who insist on a lesser role for the emperor in the selection and the making of a patriarch, provide evidence for the contemporary performance of the promotion of a patriarch as described by Pseudo-Kodinos. While the two churchmen tried to show that the emperor was subject to the Church, practice shows something different.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationStudies in Church History
    Subtitle of host publicationThe Church and Empire
    EditorsStewart Brown, Charlotte Methuen, Andrew Spicer
    Place of PublicationCambridge
    Chapter7
    Pages123-143
    Volume54
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2018

    Publication series

    NameStudies in Church History
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Volume54

    Keywords

    • Byzantine Church
    • emperor
    • caesaropapism

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Emperor and Church in the Last Centuries of Byzantium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this