Abstract
Although emissions trading is embraced as a means to curb carbon emissions and to incentivize the use of renewable energy, it is also heavily contested on ethical grounds. We will assess the main fundamental objections and possible counterarguments. Although we sympathize with some of these arguments, we argue that they are unpersuasive when an emissions trading system is well designed: emissions should be accounted ‘upstream,’ on the production rather than the consumer level. Moreover, allowances should be auctioned, and regulatory measures (such as an escalating tax on additional allowances) could instigate the right kind of behavior towards the environment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 60-75 |
| Journal | Ethics, Policy and Environment |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 7 Jun 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 7 Jun 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- climate change
- emissions trading
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Emissions trading ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver