Embryos and eagles : symbolic value in research and reproduction

Lisa Bortolotti, J Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
381 Downloads (Pure)


On both sides of the debate on the use of embryos in stem cell research, and in reproductive technologies more generally, rhetoric and symbolic images have been evoked to influence public opinion. Human embryos themselves are described as either “very small human beings” or “small clusters of cells.” The intentions behind the use of these phrases are clear. One description suggests that embryos are already members of our community and share with us a right to life or at least respectful treatment, whereas the other focuses on the differences between embryos and adult human beings with normal capacities, that is, their lack of sentience and of personal identity. The research on stem cells has been nicknamed “Frankenstein science” or presented as “research that could stop Parkinson disease.” Again, one description reminds us of scary science-fiction scenarios where the scientist is guilty of “playing God,” whereas the other description highlights the worth and potential benefits of the research outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-34
Number of pages13
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006


Dive into the research topics of 'Embryos and eagles : symbolic value in research and reproduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this