Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of interventional public health laws and regulations intended to reduce gambling-related harms: a realist review study protocol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Gambling is now widely acknowledged to be a major public health (PH) issue. The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities conservatively estimated that gambling harm is associated with an annual cost of £1.05-£1.77 billion in England alone. Marionneau et al have categorised gambling harms into seven themes: (1) financial, (2) relationship/conflict, (3) emotional and psychological (mental health), (4) health decrements (physical health), (5) employment/education, (6) cultural and (7) criminal activity. In this understanding, gambling harms are not restricted to individual experiences: they also impact families, the wider community and society, and hence they require a whole systems, PH approach, anchored in population-level interventions to reduce harms. We aim to identify the effects of interventional PH laws and regulations on the harms associated with gambling.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We limit our focus to interventional PH laws and regulations within a comprehensive search of scientific and legal databases, grey literature and books. Following Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study, Timing inclusion criteria, evidence will be screened and appraised in Covidence by two reviewers (MF and TP). Included evidence will be analysed and synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. Methodological quality will be appraised using the relevant risk of bias tool. Randomised controlled trials will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) will be used for other non-randomised studies. Qualitative studies will be appraised using the EPPI reviewer software for systematic reviewing.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) at the National Institute for Health Research and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) at the University of York (CRD42024574502). We aim to define a theory of change and produce a context-mechanism-outcome framework with relevant experts using the findings. We plan to disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, meetings with relevant experts and international conference presentations.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere093906
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Gambling/prevention & control
  • Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence
  • Research Design
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic
  • Harm Reduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of interventional public health laws and regulations intended to reduce gambling-related harms: a realist review study protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this