Abstract
Introduction: Long-term survival after curative surgery for oesophageal cancer surgery remains poor, and the prognostic impact of anastomotic leak (AL) remains unknown. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of AL on long-term survival.
Methods: A systematic electronic search for articles was performed for studies published between 2001 and 2020 evaluating the long-term oncological impact of AL. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to compute hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 9885 patients. Long-term survival was significantly reduced after AL (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.33–2.43). AL was associated with significantly reduced overall survival in studies within hospital volume Quintile 1 (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12–1.63) and Quintile 2 (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35–2.47). However, no significant association was found for studies within Quintile 3 (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.85–5.88), Quintile 4 (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 0.67–10.07), and Quintile 5 (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.92–1.81). AL was significantly associated with poor long-term survival in patients with associated overall Clavien Dindo Grades 1–5 (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.31–3.59) and severe Clavien Dindo Grades 3–5 (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78) complications.
Conclusions: AL has a negative prognostic impact on long-term survival after restorative resection of oesophageal cancers, particularly in low-volume centers. Future efforts must be focused on strategies to minimize the septic and immunological response to AL with early recognition and treatment thus reducing the impact on long-term survival.
Methods: A systematic electronic search for articles was performed for studies published between 2001 and 2020 evaluating the long-term oncological impact of AL. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to compute hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 9885 patients. Long-term survival was significantly reduced after AL (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.33–2.43). AL was associated with significantly reduced overall survival in studies within hospital volume Quintile 1 (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12–1.63) and Quintile 2 (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35–2.47). However, no significant association was found for studies within Quintile 3 (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.85–5.88), Quintile 4 (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 0.67–10.07), and Quintile 5 (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.92–1.81). AL was significantly associated with poor long-term survival in patients with associated overall Clavien Dindo Grades 1–5 (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.31–3.59) and severe Clavien Dindo Grades 3–5 (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78) complications.
Conclusions: AL has a negative prognostic impact on long-term survival after restorative resection of oesophageal cancers, particularly in low-volume centers. Future efforts must be focused on strategies to minimize the septic and immunological response to AL with early recognition and treatment thus reducing the impact on long-term survival.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | doaa085 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Diseases of the Esophagus |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 8 Sept 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of anastomotic leaks on long-term survival after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver