Abstract
The Global South and Global North terminologies, in addition to several other designations, have been used to classify the socio-economic nature of countries for centuries; however, these historical naming conventions carry subtle confusions and tend to tint political discourse. This research explores the classificatory differences in international trade, politics, economic theory, and the media and discusses how such differences inform the narratives surrounding world production and consumption systems, as well as trade. The current evidence suggests that several descriptions of the world economies create misunderstandings and often mischaracterize less developed countries while positively projecting certain countries as more advanced. I argue that, rather than using the current descriptions, the terms “users” and “makers” be adopted to characterize the nature of production and consumption in modern economies. The new terminologies are less arbitrary as they can eliminate the existing semantic problems commonly found in the media and within economic theory and political discourse. The innovative and simpler user/maker dichotomy provides a less prejudiced designation of nations and provides a new research dimension for political economy and management theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of the Knowledge Economy |
| Volume | 2023 |
| Early online date | 21 Mar 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Users versus makers
- Political economy
- economics literature
- classification economics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business,Management and Accounting
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Economies as 'Makers' or 'Users': Rectifying the Polysemic Quandary with a Dualist Taxonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver