DYNamic assessment of multi‐organ level dysfunction in patients recovering from COVID‐19: DYNAMO COVID‐19

Ayushman Gupta*, Rosemary Nicholas, Jordan J. McGing, Aline V. Nixon, Joanne E. Mallinson, Tricia M. McKeever, Christopher R. Bradley, Mathew Piasecki, Eleanor F. Cox, James Bonnington, Janet M. Lord, Christopher E. Brightling, Rachael A. Evans, Ian P. Hall, Susan T. Francis, Paul L. Greenhaff, Charlotte E. Botlon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We evaluated the impacts of COVID‐19 on multi‐organ and metabolic function in patients following severe hospitalised infection compared to controls. Patients (n = 21) without previous diabetes, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were recruited 5–7 months post‐discharge alongside controls (n = 10) with similar age, sex and body mass. Perceived fatigue was estimated (Fatigue Severity Scale) and the following were conducted: oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) alongside whole‐body fuel oxidation, validated magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy during resting and supine controlled exercise, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, short physical performance battery (SPPB), intra‐muscular electromyography, quadriceps strength and fatigability, and daily step‐count. There was a greater insulin response (incremental area under the curve, median (inter‐quartile range)) during the OGTT in patients [18,289 (12,497–27,448) mIU/min/L] versus controls [8655 (7948–11,040) mIU/min/L], P < 0.001. Blood glucose response and fasting and post‐prandial fuel oxidation rates were not different. This greater insulin resistance was not explained by differences in systemic inflammation or whole‐body/regional adiposity, but step‐count (P = 0.07) and SPPB scores (P = 0.004) were lower in patients. Liver volume was 28% greater in patients than controls, and fat fraction adjusted liver T1, a measure of inflammation, was raised in patients. Patients displayed greater perceived fatigue scores, though leg muscle volume, strength, force‐loss, motor unit properties and post‐exercise muscle phosphocreatine resynthesis were comparable. Further, cardiac and cerebral architecture and function (at rest and on exercise) were not different. In this cross‐sectional study, individuals without known previous morbidity who survived severe COVID‐19 exhibited greater insulin resistance, pointing to a need for physical function intervention in recovery.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalExperimental Physiology
Early online date24 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • COVID‐19
  • post‐acute COVID‐19 syndrome
  • recovery
  • pathophysiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'DYNamic assessment of multi‐organ level dysfunction in patients recovering from COVID‐19: DYNAMO COVID‐19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this